Friday, October 8, 2010

Fight On!


The strength you gain through hardships endured provides a vision that enables you to accurately analyze and weigh the thoughts, recommendations, and acts of even experienced professionals and would be guides.  From that evolves a rock-solid commitment to manage your destiny.

Never underestimate your power. Wield it with the confidence and self-assurance that goes hand-in-hand with that commitment.

Your active role in the decision-making process, the extensive research that you have conducted, the enormous network you have cultivated, are all part of a divine plan to see you through the most challenging ordeal.

We were never meant to "Go placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence…," as espoused by Max Ehrmann in Desiderata. Where is the growth in such a perspective? You are battling powerful forces that are kept at bay only by your diligence.

As Algernon Sydney simply put it, "God helps those who help themselves." Let there be no doubt about His appreciation for your efforts. The reward is the incredible bond of love that will be yours forever.

Friday, October 1, 2010

Integrity in government

CNN's Jack Cafferty on openness in government


Being a little low on the political totem pole, Cafferty's message took nearly nine months to reach me.  It's message is just as chilling today. 


Time spent pointing fingers is time wasted.  The effort (focus, if you will) has to be upon finding a way out of this situation.  There should be a way to hold politicians accountable, short-term - less than impeachment.  If you lie, if you fail to fulfill promises you have made, then there should be a penalty.

Under our current system, the only true recourse is impeachment.  Those who serve as jury in an impeachment process are part of the same group as the person being impeached.  Would you select gang members for a jury in the trial of a gang leader?

Perhaps establishment of a national scoreboard would work.  It could be publicly posted and provide a record of shortcomings/failures by category.  An elected official starts off with a value of 100.  There would be no positive points for work well done, since that is expected and also the reason the individual was elected.  Points would be subtracted for:

  • shortcomings:  1
  • misrepresentations:  2
  • failures:  3
  • lies:  5
Scoring could be done by a panel representing a cross-section of our population.

The score would be a tool to compare performance of politicians.  It would also elevate public dialogue, enable more knowledgeable decisions at the polls,  and when necessary, expedite the impeachment process.